GARMIN 010-00329-05 Forerunner 101 Personal Training Device

GARMIN 010-00329-05 Forerunner 101 Personal Training Device





Review: My Favorite Gadget - Perfect for Walkers
by: on date: March 28, 2004
I just received this item and used it today for the first time. It's very easy to set up and use and is very accurate. I'm training for a Breast Cancer 3-Day 60-mile walk and this is perfect for my outdoor walking. (It will also work well for running, biking, etc.) I used to only walk places if I checked out the distance in my car first. Now I can walk anywhere I want (on or off-road) and I can keep track of my distance (and speed) without mentally adding up the miles. The Forerunner 101 uses 2 AAA batteries but the Forerunner 201 has an internal rechargeable battery (and you can download information to a PC). I chose this one because I wanted the flexibility to be able to just pop in new batteries whenever I need them instead of waiting for a recharge. Also, on my 3-day walk I won't have access to electricity. This is definitely my favorite gadget of all time. I can't believe it is so affordable.

Review: Great Gift for any Runner
by: Steven L. Mckee on date: March 26, 2004
I live in the "country" and run various routes and always wanted to know how far that I really was running. I also travel alot with the military and I love this tool. I do not need to "guess" how far that I am running in the various cities that I visit. The ability to store large amounts of running history, years worth, is a great feature! The only thing that I regret is that I wish the watch was only $99 when I bought mine :(... but I have enjoyed every mile / minute of this watch. You will not regret buying this watch!

Review: Don't get this model
by: R. Adjemian on date: March 25, 2004
I have the 201 model, and am able to re-charge the batteries. The 101 model requires separate batteries. You should know that this device eats batteries. It's better to have the 201 with the built in rechargeable battery (this gives you 11-12 hours of GPS watch time).

Review: love, love, love, love it!!!
by: John A. Radi on date: May 7, 2004
That being said, I only give it 4 stars because I kind of miss the ability to link to my computer (I'm an ultra geek). Still, Lion batteries ONLY have a life of 3 years max - don't let anyone tell you otherwise - and 3 years it won't be NEAR it's original life. EVEN IF it were brand new out of the box, Lion chemistry starts to decay the day after it comes off the manufacturing line - do some research on the internet - that's why the whole slew of ipods are all dying right now.

Enough said - AAA batteries was the primary reason I bought this. Truth is, I rarely keep gadgets long enough to worry about the batteries, but I like passing them on to family and friends and I'd like them to get something that they can use for a couple of years too... Plus, I like putting in a fresh set of batteries every week and not having to worry if it's fully charged... (I use rechargeable AAA's).

All the other reviewers have already covered the basics of the watch. Very easy to use, backlight is amazing at night. History and data compilation are interesting.

What I really wanted to convey is that I was on the fence about this for over a month. Was it worth the money? Would I use it enough? Without a doubt - YES! If it broke today I'd buy a new one tomorrow. The best thing about it is freedom.

I'm pretty anal - most serious runners are. I stick to the exact same path so I can get statistics, make sure I'm sticking to my pace, make sure I ran the distance I intended, compare my run with previous runs. After a while though, it can get a little boring. All of a sudden, I put this on and I'm free from all that. I can run anywhere, I run spontaneously - but a glance down at my wrist and I know how far I've run, I know I'm keeping pace, EVERYTHING. And that little training buddy is pretty cool too - although I usually just like the raw data screen...

I hope in future versions they'll integrate a heart rate monitor. I have one now but can't bring myself to wear two devices at a time...

-jr

Review: The Forerunner 201 for those on a budget
by: Pen Name on date: March 28, 2004
The Garmin Forerunner 101 is exactly the same as the popular Forerunner 201, with a couple of small changes. Being the case, I won't review the actual product since everything that needs to be said about it's GPS features can be found in the reviews for the Forerunner 201.

The most notable difference with the 101 is that it uses 2 AAA batteries istead of being rechargeable like the 201. At first I thought this was a big detraction to buying it, but it's really not that bad. Battery life is decent, although not as high as with the 201, which gets up to 13 hours of use on a full charge. But if you're not a marathon runner and just run a few miles on your runs, this shouldn't matter much. The only hassle is having the batteries go dead during the middle of a run, which really sucks if you're into knowing exactly how far you've gone. You have to keep an eye on the battery life before going out. The batteries don't really effect the weigh or size of the product though.

The second major difference is that this unit does not interface with your PC. This also isn't too big of a problem because, currently, the Garmin software is really lacking. Hopefully they will improve on it with time, but the PC software is nowhere near as nice as it could be at this stage. You can view a graph of your altitude for your run, and graphs of your pace and speed, and that's about it. Otherwise the software is really crummy. You can't even zoom in on your map like you can with the actual unit.

If you're serious about running, I would highly suggest the Forerunner 201 over this product, mainly because the price difference is so negligible. You can find the 201 for only about $20 more than this model, and the extra money is well worth the rechargeability of the 201 and freedom from the batteries. But if you really can't afford the cost, you're not going to be hurting too much with the 101.

Review: Why AAA Batteries (101) Best Internal Batteries (201)
by: Matthew Harris on date: April 7, 2004
I chose to buy the Forerunner 101 rather than the 201 precisely because of its power system. First, rechargeable AAA batteries are relatively cheap, and they last forever. They are also small, and while traveling I'd rather lug around two extra small batteries than a recharging cord. Moreover, in a pinch, you can always find a store that sells standard AAA batteries. Additionally, who wants to wait for the internal batteries to recharge - I'd rather always have a fresh set of rechargeable AAA's on hand.
With this said, it was a tough choice deciding between the 101 and the 201. If only the 101 came with the uploading capabilities of the 201. That, in my mind, would have been the best of both worlds. In the end, I opted for the 101.

Review: Very satisfied
by: John on date: May 26, 2004
First let me say that I am not an avid runner and to be quite honest I have hated the sport of running. (sorry) Because I am in the military we are required to run so I have had to take up the sport. The biggest problem I had though was finding a way to pace myself and train. Everyone has their own suggestion but to follow most regimens you had to know exactly how far and fast you are running.
Now to the forerunner. Since I have purchase this running has become enjoyable. It has always worked very well even in wooded areas and only takes a short time to lock on. It gives you so much information and can do so many things to help one train and pace!! It is very easy to use and to download to the computer. The log book is also excellent and allows one to keep track of distance, time, pace, calories, etc. It has allowed me to run where ever I want and not have to figure out beforehand how long of a run it will be. Only once did it miscalculate my speed (ran a 5 minute mile; I wish).
The only problem I had was when I first got it and had trouble following the instructions for set up. Also one needs to download the new software for the forerunner and log book which fixes freezes.
Again from a non-runner, I would highly recommend it!

Review: The Most Useful Fitness Computer You Can Buy
by: on date: June 15, 2004
I've purchased heart rate monitors, altimeters, and computer software as training aids in the past. Their quality was always subpar, and their utility was limited to a small set of variables. Inevitibly, I was still required to use a pen, paper and calculator to figure out much of the training info I needed. In addition, few of these gadgets were helpful in motivating me. I purchased the Forerunner 101 so that I could track my distance and my pace accurately while I ran. Because it is so incredibly accurate, I can run on any of the trails around my house and still know how far I've gone. The unit has been designed extremely well. The numbers YOU want to see are large. The readability of the LCD is excellent. The price makes the product a GREAT value for the money. The quality overall is outstanding. The unit itself is well designed--The Garmin design team needs to be congratulated. Yes, it's a bit heavy, but for the functions it performs, it's well worth it. The Virtual Partner is a waste of time for me. But when I run an official race, I'm sure I'll use it. Like many of the other reviewers, I wish the Forerunner 201 was equiped with AA batteries, as I simply don't trust ION batteries to hold out for much longer than 3 years. This is one of the best fitness products that you can buy!!

Review: Revolutionized my running
by: William Jankowski on date: October 8, 2004
1. Super easy to use. Turn it on, wait until it syncs up with the satellites, push start, and it's off. Push stop when you want to stop. Reset the counters. The run is now in internal memory.

2. The unit's got a pretty sensitive reciever. Our neighborhood is pretty wooded, but it'll gain sync in our driveway, under a giant maple tree and smaller japanese maple. It holds it pretty well on the roads. I haven't tried a trail run - yet.

3. I don't think it's too obtrusive. My lovely wife thought it was a little too big to strap to her wrist. It does come with a band extender; Melissa is thinking about trying it again strapped to her upper arm. The disadvantage would be not being able to see the display, but if you're just interested in recording, it's not an issue. That, and most of the functions (mile marker, etc) have audible cueing. I can't hear the beeps over my iPod, though.

4. Nice features - Clear display, good backlight. The backlight automatically comes on when the unit has an alert (passing another mile, falling off pace, etc). The Training Partner is kind of nice. If Garmin keeps it when the Forerunner is updated, they could speed it up on downhills and slow it down on uphills (GPS gives elevation data).

Gripes:
1. The unit design is not poor by any stretch of the imagination. But, after the iBook and the iPod (not to mention small details like the international power adapters Apple has available that work with both items' power supplies), my standards are high. My gripe is that the UI is 6 buttons, all pretty similar size and texture, on the side of the unit. One of the reasons I'm skeptical of today's third mile split is because I accidentally turned the unit off between the 1st and 2nd miles. I stopped and turned it back on again, but it threw off the "odometer". Yes, I was an idiot for pushing and holding the power button (for like 3 seconds; it's not really easy to do by mistake), but the backlight is turned on by briefly pressing the power button.

2. It's missing the geeky GPS features, like a lat/long display, or the ability to select between different GPS data (WGS 84/UTM/etc - you either know what I'm talking about already, or you don't care). There are some work-arounds I've found (such as marking a waypoint at the current location to get lat/long), but I don't think I'm getting rid of my Magellan GPS 315 any time soon. I think this may be intentional on Garmin's part - why give away a big part of their market on a sub - $100 device. I think it'll work backpacking, especially if I take the time to pre-set waypoints. But I'm still mainly a map-and-compass kind of guy in any case. And the 101's "Back to start" feature ought to bail me out.

3. There's no ability to turn GPS on/off unless the machine can't acquire a satellite. There's also no ability to tell the unit where it is, so initial acquisition of a signal can last up to 30 minutes the first time you turn the unit on, or if you travel more than 500 miles with the unit off. In practicality, mine acquired signal in about 5 minutes right out of the box.

Review: Weak GPS reception makes this useless
by: Colossal on date: February 2, 2005
The first two times I used this device it worked relatively fine -- GPS signal dropped a couple of times, but I expected this to happen every once in a while. Ever since then, I get signal, at best, about 25% of the time. Cloudy, not cloudy. Tall buildings or a clearing -- the signal is always weak (and the batteries are good). I'm giving this device two stars because the concept is fantastic. Too bad the device is useless without signal. The stopwatch works well, but I can get one of those for $10 at Target. Perhaps my unit is defective. Either way, I'm returning it.

Review: It actually DOES work!
by: A. D. Straw on date: December 8, 2004
I purchased this product with the expectations that it would most certainly NOT work. I was sure that it would not be able to locate, or hold, the satellite signal or would not be truly accurate. I'm happy to report that I was wrong about both. I turn on my unit, set it outside, put on my walking shoes, and by the time I leash up the dogs, my Garmin has found the satellite and I'm off and walking. I should also say that it appears to be very accurate. To check it, I walked 2 miles one way, and then took the same route back to see if it would give me the same mileage. Going out, I walked 2.00 miles, and coming back, it said I walked 2.05 miles. That is plenty accurate enough for me. I've used this product everyday and it has yet to lose the satelite signal once securing it.
The only negative thing I can come up with is that the battery life does not last the 14 hours, or so, that is advertised. It's more like 8 to 10 hours, at the most, before I have to change batteries.

I would highly recommend this product. Hope this review helps you!

Review: This is a must have for runners!
by: C. Rothe on date: August 7, 2004
I have owned my Forerunner for a year now. I absolutely love the item. First, it is fantastic to know exactly how far I've run, no matter what roads, trails, or bike path I run on. I am no longer confined to my 'measured routes'...I can explore! The Forerunner also gives the current pace. This is probably the second most useful feature it has. While running, I can tell if I have RECENTLY sped up or slowed down. It is much better than the average pace which a sdm will give you. Think about it, if you are on mile 10 and you speed up 30 seconds per mile, your average pace will not be affected immediately.
Some of the other features I find less useful but harmless. The mapping feature on the 101 is silly since the map must be displayed on the 2" screen. Its simply too small. The virtual trainer could be useful, but I never use it.
Other great features are: if set, it will take your mile splits automatically and if set, the back light will come on at each mile (for those early morning runs).
The battery life is great. I am using two normal Duracell batteries and run about 80 miles before changing the batteries.
The signal strength is fine. I have run on tree covered paths and on cloudy days with very few problems. I lost the signal once, but it was very thick tree cover. It continued to track my distance but I don't think it was 100% accurate with the weak signal. Other than that I've never lost my signal.
This product is simply great and I cannot explain how useful it is. Here is how I use it:
I typically start my weekday runs around 5:00am. I leave my front door and walk for a minute or so. I have my signal. I start off on a 6 mile run. I warm up with a pace around 9 min/mi and keep that pace for the first mile. While thinking about my upcoming race my watch beeps and lights up (it is 5:10 am now) and I see that I ran a 9:08 mile. I pick up the pace until I get to an 8 min pace. I realize I ran this same route earlier this week. I decide to turn and run down a new street for some variety. Before I know it my watch beeps, I look down at the lit screen to see that my second mile was 7:58. This goes on for a couple of miles. Around my fourth mile I my mind starts to wander. I look down and notice that I've slowed down during this time. I immediately pick up the pace and decide it is time to find a way home. The way home takes a little longer than I expected, but I get there. I stop my watch to see that I actually ran 6.67 miles and have found another good route. Once inside I can review my data...distance, pace each mile, average pace, fastest pace, the route, and I can compare that to my previous runs! I see I've had another successful run and feel great! I hope my example illustrates the way I use my Forerunner and why I love it.

Review: Unbeatable for Walking - A Fantastic Piece of Technology
by: E. Osworth on date: September 23, 2004
This thing is an excellent product at a very reasonable price.

It is lightweight and has an ingenious strap system so you can wear it on your wrist or even over a jacket (It get's cold here in Oregon). The batteries last a Long Time, just be sure to turn it off when you are done using it. There is no auto-off after a certain amount of time, like my other GPS unit.

You get the data you need and more.

Pace, altitude, distance, time, lap, and it creates a map of your walk at the same time, so you can use it to back track. The reception is good here and I live (and walk) in a Pacific Northwest forest! When it does lose a signal, it grabs it back quickly.

Be sure to set it outside about 5 minutes before you want to walk or run. It takes a while to get the first fix, which can be frustrating if you are waiting.

You can use it as a basic GPS, so if you hike in a strange place turn it on, start a new run and it will draw you a map and point you the way back to where you started. Pretty Neat.

I have another GPS with much more sophisticated and extensive GPS features, but I find myself using the Forerunner instead most of the time when I am hiking. After getting used to the convenience of the light weight, hands-free Forerunner with it's big easy to read display, the other GPS seems like carrying a brick.







Review: Not accurate
by: Miles E. Branch on date: November 15, 2004
The pace calculation is very inaccurate. I have been running for 15 years and know when I am maintaining a constant pace. According the Forerunner 101 my pace varies from 7:30-minute miles to 9:00-minute miles all within the same mile. This renders the virtual training partner feature useless. This is not much more than a very expensive sports watch. When I sent an e-mail to Garmin tech support about the problem. It took them almost four working days to answer and then only to tell me that that's as good as it gets.

Review: a disappointment
by: Rita Felski on date: November 14, 2004
I was thrilled to get this gadget at first, as I find difficult to gauge how fast I'm running. However, I've had it for about four or five months now, and increasingly, I'm finding that the GPS function is not working (and no, it's not a battery problem). 80% of the time, when I'm out running, the watch face reads "weak GPS signals," at which point, it stops working. This happens both when I'm running in town and in the country. I don't know if this has anything to do with where I live (Charlottesville, VA), but I'm becoming increasingly frustrated with this gadget!

Review: Awesome for marathon training!
by: A. Hall on date: June 9, 2005
I've had the Garmin Forerunner 101 for about 6 months. I bought it to help me train for my first marathon. Without this tool it would have been difficult to maintain variety in my training, which I considered a key element in staying motivated. I also recommend this for those who travel. You no longer have to find pre-determined distances--you can just run wherever you feel like. I have used it in a few different countries and love its versatility. I also feel the 101 is a better value than the 201, it's about 50-100 bucks less because it uses AAA batteries, that's the only difference. However, the 201 is slimmer in design. I highly recommend this product--well worth the money!!

Review: Old Runner Tries Something High Tech
by: C. Carter on date: March 26, 2005
I investigated all of the reviews on this unit and purchased it with minimal expectations at amazon.com.
This unit exceeds my expectations for service. It does everything that it should do and was promised to do. It gives me the freedom to run routes without having to pre measure and the accuracy is astounding. I am a 60 year old runner that runs one half marathon race per month. I am so impressed with this unit. The main criticism I had heard about was that it would lose signals. Not the case. I run rural areas with trees and have encountered no loss of signal at all. The ease of operation is astounding. The navigation system has not been totally mastered but will be with time.
If you are a runner, buy this unit. The batteries hold up well and unless you want to download into a computer, save your money and buy this unit.
Thanks

Alabama Old Runner

Review: Very happy with this purchase
by: Jen on date: February 11, 2005
I love the Forerunner, it really pushes me to work harder on my walks and runs when I have a measurable record of my time, pace, and distance. I find that the pace function is not terribly accurate and seems to lag behind my actual pace, but I believe the average pace listed at the end of the run is fairly accurate, and that is all that I am concerned with. The first day I ran with it, I wore it on my wrist, but it was not all that comfortable, so the next day I added the extender strap to it and wore it on my forearm, just below my elbow, and I liked it a lot better that way; I don't even notice it there. I could even see the screen better by just looking down at it and not having to lift my wrist up. I think the pace function was slightly more accurate when worn up higher on the arm because the unit wasn't swinging around as much. I wear a black terrycloth wristband (cheapo type) under the Forerunner's strap so that the strap doesn't get all sweaty, and it makes the unit more comfortable to wear as well. I like the fact that the batteries can be changed; I want to use this thing for much longer than the expected life of rechargeable type batteries.

Review: Nice unit for the price.
by: Tom on date: July 12, 2005
I've used this GPS for about a week now, so I don't have in-depth knowledge of all the functions, but I can give some feedback.

I didn't like the clunky feel of something that size on my wrist and I didn't like it on my arm (just personal preference). So I use a small cell phone case clipped to my belt. I really like the fact that it is water proof, because the first day I used it, the rain was heavy. The auto alarm feature to chime every X miles is great (I set it to chime every .5 miles), as is the auto-lap feature which I set to log my 1 mile splits. Recalling the runs works well since it shows splits and cumulative time in one screen, and it shows daily, weekly and a total miles (although I don't yet know what "total" here means - since I put new batteries in?) The main navigation screen (with a dotted-line map) is very cryptic and I can't imagine using it to find your way back to a starting point like they advertise.

Since my requirements were simply (initially) tell me how far I've run, and at what pace, and a price around $100, this unit did great. Now, of course, my wish list has changed since I've been using it. Here are a few features I think it should have that would be trivial for the manufacturer to add:

* Get rid of the wrist-watch style band (pins) and put the band through slots in the back of the unit so the band would be easier to remove to wash, or
* For those of use who sweat when we run, make the band out of soft rubber, so it won't get stinky since it is made out of fabric.
* Auto power off if it is not being used (i.e. user has not pressed a button in 10 minutes and the unit hasn't moved), since the batteries only last one day if left on.
* Add a small hole on one end so I can attach a short lanyard to pull it out of a cell phone case.


Review: great gear but not waterproof enough
by: M. McGraw on date: June 17, 2005
I love the 101 - I'm addicted to the feedback, exactness, etc. I won't run or bike without it. It even works as a poor man's GPS for very basic navigational use.

Only real deficiency is that for someone who sweats profusely (which means, "anyone who works out in South Florida 8 months of the year") the unit is not waterproof. This fact is ironic since I first saw it advertised in a magazine on the arm of an extreme kayaker splashing through big surf. I returned it to Garmin once and they replaced it. I still have to break open the battery box after every sweaty run and swab out the battery area and connections with a q-tip to attempt to fight corrosion. Waterproofing is the only achilles heel of an otherwise phenomenal piece of gear.

Not sure if the 201 has the same problem given the fact that it doesn't have batteries.


Review: Tried and true
by: N. Andrix on date: June 20, 2005
I bought this is desperation after my bike magnetic sensor had frustrated me beyond words. The bike mount is great and the 101 worked flawlessly on a 130 ride through all sorts of back roads and terrain. Next I took it to Acadia National park on some bike and hike routes - in lousy weather most of the time. Again, absolutely no problems and readings are sooo accurate - including altitude! Get the battery model and keep a spare set.

Review: great training device
by: Michael E. Mchugh on date: September 30, 2005
5 stars-- it does everything i want it to do. running, geocaching, and even a little navigation while paddling my kayak! of the three run is what it is designed for, but all in all a very versatile machine!

Review: 101 Wrist-Mounted GPS Personal Training Device
by: Michelle Mitchell on date: September 29, 2005
The quality of the product is exceptional and reasonably priced. HOwever, it is very difficult to program using the instructions that are provided.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101
by: E. Thompson on date: September 16, 2005
A great piece of technology. I am marathon training and it has been very helpful. I have used it in Houston and in Honolulu and it worked very well both places. I did have a complete failure with the original about 10 days in but Amazon replaced it immediately even before the old one was returned. I do suggest upgrading to the next model which I understand is rechargeable, as I have to change bateries. Or just change batteries. I recommend this produt strongly.

Review: Too big!
by: ADG in Dallas on date: September 5, 2005
It works fine, but it's way, way, way too large! Who wants to run around with a gadget the size of a cell phone strapped on your wrist. I jog IN PUBLIC man! I just cut the band off and now I run with it in my cell phone case.

If you buy it, be sure to get a cell phone case to go with it. Type this number in the amazon.com search box to get the same case I have (it's a perfect fit): B00024S92U. That product number should pull it right up.

Review: Great item, I enjoy the freedom
by: David F. Guy on date: July 28, 2005
This is my second Garmin Product. I actually started out with the 201. Twice It died on me. First time, after 3 months, so it was in warranty. Second time, a year later. I wanted another GPS device, and figured the 101 would be simpler, so less to break-down. (yeah yeah, no reason to buy something!). So far it's been working fine. I don't miss the download capability, and the slight size increase due to the AAA batteries hasn't been a problem.
Despite their occasionaly odd problems, (seizing up, etc.) Garmin puts out a pretty good product. I do agree with what others have said,,MAKE THE WRIST BAND EASY TO REMOVE FOR CLEANING!! It gets a little funky after a few sweaty runs.

Review: newbie for GPS and Marathon
by: A. Longano on date: July 18, 2005
Taken on the daunting task of preparing for the NYC marathon. Noticed this item when looking for a pedometer that would accurately measure distance. Since I have been only using the device for two weeks I would list the following:
· Pros:
1. Easy to use- press a button (after 2 - 5minutes of initial location of GPS signal) and u are off and running. In both areas that I use my device in northern NJ it founds a signal within 5 minutes while I am stretching. When it loses a signal it recalibrates when it finds it again so I don't lose much in mileage listing.
2. Variety - no more measuring off routes in my car for those long distance runs. Now I can just take off and explore- Great to be able to just be able to glance down and see distance, time, and my average speed.
3. Water resistance- basic water resistance (it says) so sweat and some rain shouldn't break your near $100.00-training piece.
4. Training log- who needs to download info, u can quick views your progress and delete unneeded ones or errors.
5. Batteries- personal preference, I like the AAA options- u don't have to worry about charging times or can just go with rechargeable batteries and always have 2 ready in case of emergency.
6. Value- for this low price it is worth a shot but save your box and receipt in case signal fails in your area.
· Cons:
1. Signal- if you do trail running or some inner city running the signal could be a concern. Noticed that heavy tree canopy or large buildings may block signal. It does pick up the signal and recalibrate but that may not be an option if u run on a tree covered park/trail all the time. Maybe the Fortex would be better for Trails?
2. Rudimentary Map- the "breadcrumb" dotted map navigation is more of a gimmick. Not sure if I could find my way back by using the very basic map information. But this is really a GPS for keeping track of running and biking information not trying to find yourself around. If you need a real navigation system you would need a more advance and more expensive item.
3. Delivery- Amazon took over 2 weeks and still had not shipped. Went with a Merchant and it shipped the next day.

Overall - worth the money for your training- it helps keep runs fresh and the ability to check how your stats are is amazing. The use of the Forerunner gets very addicting and it is now as valuable as my MP3 player on my runs. Hope it keeps working till November and beyond! Good luck and healthy running.


Review: 3 Replacements- So Far!!
by: Z. Gonzalez on date: November 11, 2005
I bought my battery operated Forerunner in 2004. Since then, I have had the unit replaced a total of 3 times to date because each unit inexplicably stops working after weeks or months of use (I use it for running workouts only). I have not received a reason or response from the company as to why this happens. All the feedback you get is to return the malfunctioning unit for "repairs." Inevitably, they send you a brand new one. Of course the company does not cover your own cost to ship the unit each time. It's great technology that works well-when it works. Because of my experience with the unit I would not recommend it to anyone, nor will I purchase another from this company.

Review: Great little gadget
by: Dan - Seattle on date: December 12, 2005
extremely accurate and convenient to use. The AAA batteries last surprisingly long; I have had it for about a month and have yet to replace the batteries. It connects to GPS quite fast and holds on well. Of course you can't run in the woods because the trees block the signals. I like running with it because it's fun to keep track of my progress.

Review: Mine Broke in 80 Days.
by: William Durham on date: December 10, 2005
I bought the Garmin to train for a marathon. It was great at first-- being able to run without coming up with routes and getting extremely accurate pace information, etc.

BUT: After about 30 days, it started messing up occassionally. Example: I would run for 11 minutes, look down and it would say I'd run 2 miles (I usually run 9 minute miles). Or, I'd look down and realize it hadn't been recording me run for 5 or 6 minutes.

After that, I always had doubts about accuracy.

Then, it started struggling to find a signal. Every time I wanted to use it, I would have to relocate the signal (which takes 10 minutes, as opposed to the normal 1-2 minutes).

Then, it wouldn't turn off. I had to remove the batteries after use and put them back in whenever I would use it. Then after about 80 days (of heavy use, running 30-40 miles/week), it stopped working altogether.

Didn't even make it through 1 marathon training. Maybe mine was a fluke. I didn't call customers service. Maybe they'd have replaced it. Nonetheless, it was quite annoying.

Review: Excellent Trainer for the budget-minded!!!
by: T. Mettler on date: December 7, 2005
I purchased this several months ago and it is very cool. First of all, being kind of a gadget guy, it motivates me to go running since I can use the gadget. the personal trainer is a nice function, too. It keeps me honest and sometimes I like to "race" the trainer. The GPS locks in pretty quick, but sometimes can lose signal in trees.

If you want to spend a little more to be able to download data to your computer, look to the 201, but for the money, this is a great buy.

Review: Really good GPS
by: C. Maeda on date: December 15, 2005
I really like this GPS. I use it mainly for hiking and backpacking and it has taken a lot of abuse. It isn't totally waterproof... just water resistant. I have worn it in the rain and it was fine although water did get into the battery compartment during a particularly bad downpour. Its' very light... One of the lightest GPSes on the market. Its' not overly complex and its' good for backtracking and going off trail. I like that the screen is recessed into the unit because I've bumped it many times into rocks and stuff but because the screen is recessed into the unit, there's only very light scratches on it. My other GPS doesn't have this feature. I really like how the screens are setup as well. You can make custom screens to track your mileage, time and other stuff.
That said, I do have a couple complaints. The first complaint is that the battery lasts about 8 or 9 hours. That means I always have to carry extra batteries during backpacking trips that are longer than 2 days. (I keep the GPS on for 4 or 5 hours per day on average.)
The battery compartment is also a pain. Its' hard to get the batteries out without using a screwdriver. I use rechargeable batteries and damaged the top of one. So I now put a short strip of ribbon in the battery compartment to make it easier to take the battery out.
The reception is not as good as my other GPS... A Magellan eXplorist 300. But it is good enough most of the time for me to get around. The only time, I have lost the GPS signal for a long period of time was in the Grand Canyon, where I frequently lost the signals for miles at a time. But that's probably because of the canyon walls. But for most trips, the reception is fine. Reception is poor inside my home unless I'm near the window. I noticed that the eXplorist always has good reception just about anywhere.
This is the GPS I use most of the time. Its' light, simple, cheap and it keeps me on trail.

Review: I'm taking mine back to the store today
by: Nobody special on date: January 29, 2006
This is probably a good product for walkers or hikers, or for non-urban runners. However, I wore it on a run around a 5/8 mile track that passes about 20 feet from a parking garage and a hospital. On the first lap, the Forerunner measured .51 miles. On the second, it registered 18.6 miles! And so it went. My 5/8 mile lap shows up as anywhere from .3 to 20 miles. I e-mailed Garmin tech support and got a prompt response telling me that it's called multipath error and directing me to another company's website for an explanation. I get the impression that Garmin isn't particularly proud of this product.

I also find that it's very slow to capture the signal. I don't want to stand around for 5 minutes waiting for the sattelite signal before I can get moving.

My last comment is about the size and weight. I'm a small woman, and I find it pretty uncomfortable because the width of the unit is just a little greater than the space between the bones of my wrist. Even though the band fits loosely, the weight and pressure compromise circulation to my hand.

I do believe it would be good for hikers in open country who just need a rough estimate of how far they've gone (I haven't tried the mapping feature, since I run in a circle and it's pretty hard to get lost that way.) For training purposes, though, it doesn't give me accurate enough information to be of any use.

Review: Great product, but only last for a few weeks.
by: J. CHANG on date: August 24, 2006
I bought my first Forerunner 201 2 months ago. It had so many wonderful functions, I purchased 3 more immediately for our running team. After 2 weeks, one went dead. Then, one by one, three went dead. Amazon is excellent in replacing new ones. But even the replacement broke down after a few weeks. I really like the product, but now I am looking for other options - Timex Distance+time, or Nevman.

Review: My husband loves it!
by: M. Jacques on date: August 21, 2006
I bought this for my husband who ran his 1st marathon last fall. He can keep on pace, see his accurate distance, tell how many calories he's burned, etc. I personally don't have much experience with it, but my husband says He loves it!

Review: Very tempermental and often innacurate.
by: GrizzlyMike on date: May 24, 2006
I recently purchased this unit to replace the wireless computer on my bicycle. Out in the open the unit often works fine. Any time you venture onto any trails or urban areas with tall buildings the unit fails miserably and you get the GPS tracking error.

Also, I noticed any time you cycle within close proximity to trees you lose a signal as well. It doesnt seem to matter how high the trres are or if the tree coverage is to the left,right, or both - once you come withint 500 feet of a treeline the unit just loses signal and refuses to track even when the remainder of the view remains clear.

I have found unless you run, hike, or bike in an area that offers complete 360 degree unobstructed views the unit is pretty much worthless.

Another thing I noticed is that more than once when I did have signal acquisition the readouts would be innacurate. For instance I would often get a readout that has my speed at say 78mph and have me traveling 220 miles when in fact I simply rode perhaps half a mile at a lesiruley pace. Overall this has given me reason to suspect the accuracy of the unit even when signal acquisition is not an issue.

I suspect this is one of those 'you get what you pay for' scenarios that you learn from. Cheapest is not always best. Unfortunatley you cannot try before you buy.

Back to the regular cycle computer.

Review: good buy
by: Erik D. Segura on date: March 19, 2006
great for keeping your training log. uses up batteries fast, yet very user friendly

Review: Excellent for runners
by: Aaron P. Vowels on date: March 14, 2006
I've been using the Forerunner 101 since my wife got it for me for Valentine's Day. It's an outstanding piece of equipment. I use it for all my runs and the Virtual Partner helps out since I haven't found anyone crazy enough to run with me. I ran the Anthem 5K last weekend and it was not only accurate, but apparently water-resistant because of the pouring rain. It does seem to lose signal if you're amongst the skyscrapers in the city, but once you run out of the "concrete canyons" it pops you right back to where you need to be. I'm thrilled with it and I hope to be using it for years to come.

Review: Garmin review
by: T. Largo on date: March 8, 2006
It's nice to finally know how far each run is! Sometimes it's a bit of a bother to have to put the device out in the open prior to a run to allow it to "find" its bearings, but this usually takes about 2 minutes. Also, I have tended to go through the AAA batteries pretty quickly, so need to keep the device off when not in use.

Review: Battery eater, but pretty neat
by: Suzanne D. Ramsey on date: March 21, 2007
Eats batteries, so I would suggest getting a AAA charger. 15 hours isn't very long if you do long runs or walks. Other than that, and it's enormous size, which is a little big for a woman's arm in my opinion, it's really neat. It seems to work well, and I like knowing exactly how far I've gone. Haven't tried it on trails with lots of tree cover yet, but works well in the winter.

Review: Best Buy For The Buck!
by: W. R. Happe on date: March 15, 2007
The Forerunner 101 is extremely accurate and fun to use. Verified it several times. Advantages are low cost, buy your own rechargeable batteries and don't have to worry about lithiums or replacements. Purchase an inexpensive heart monitor if you want and save all the added expense of getting the combination unit. If the heart rate monitor/belt goes bad you can replace it cheaper. Overall cost is lower, basics are there, batteries easily replaced, keeps good records. A little more effort but not inconvenient. Prefer it to the more expensive models.

Review: Great product!
by: K. Mathe on date: March 11, 2007
This product is amazing! It is so easy to use and so useful especially when running long distances and you don't know how far you've been. I would recommend this product to anyone!

Review: garmin user
by: T. L. McDonald on date: March 8, 2007
Wonderfull training device, i have not started using the virtual trainer but can't wait to start.

Review: The Forerunner 101 is fantastic!
by: Michelle Hart on date: February 20, 2007
The Forerunner 101 is easy to use. It may not have as many bells and whistles as some of the other models, but it does have all of the functions I need. I thought having to change batteries would be a pain, but it hasn't been an issue. Definitely worth the money.

Review: A great little gadget
by: Mr. A on date: January 9, 2007
I bought this for my girlfriend as a gift. She is very petite and I was afraid it would be too big for her. Not only does the wrist strap adjust to fit snuggly, it also is light enough where she barely realizes she has it on. The display is big enough to see at a quick glance. It "warms up" quickly and is ready to use in a matter of seconds. A great "toy" at a really good price.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101--Awesome
by: Cora Robbins on date: January 3, 2007
One of the best running watches I've ever purchased! Very accurate and aids in any workout that I have!

Review: Unknown Chemicals
by: Helen on date: November 21, 2006
Was a little upset that no where online did it mention that this product has chemicals in it that are known to cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm. I returned it immediately and did not even try it out. If I had tried it out - I'm sure I would have loved it, but I can find a GPS system that's not going to mess up my future.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101: Love It or Hate It.
by: T. A. Seidl on date: November 11, 2006
I'm loving it. Once you understand and accept the limitations of GPS you will be able to live with it's shortcomings. So far, I haven't had trouble with my unit with regards to functionality or signal reception in flat open NE Ohio. For an entry level device, considering it's light weight and small size, it is a little marvel. Ten years ago, much larger hand held units where massively more inaccurate than people accuse the Forerunner of having today. One nice feature about GPS units is that once the device has physically visited a particular location, it will be more precise when it visits that location again. The data the Forerunner produces is very helpful in maintaining pace and tracking distances, but the virtual partner is hidden gem of encouragement. Accurate or not, the Forerunner has gotten me out on the road again when I normally wouldn't bother.

Review: Good but missing something
by: Shelly 824 on date: May 9, 2007
This is a good product if you want the basics only. It takes awhile for the satellite tracking to find you but once it does you are all set...unless you are around a city with lots of tall buildings. If you want to track distance and time only this is the perfect product for you. If you want heart rate, training monitoring and step count, keep looking this isn't even close. I use it a lot when I am walking and it is very compact so it fits in my purse so I can take it to work. I walk at lunch so to monitor my distance and time only this is perfect. I don't use it when I really workout after work. It runs on AAA batteries so that makes it easy to replace them even though they last a long time.

Review: No signal and unexpected power loss
by: N. Prause on date: May 7, 2007
I was so excited to get this, but I've now tried it multiple times in different cities, and it drops the sinal constantly. Unfortunately, it just not reliable for distance or speed. For those of us with real training needs (I don't want to know when I've gone "about" a mile, I need to know if my mile was in 7:40 or 7:42) this does not work.

Also, multiple brand new batteries and the unit indicating full battery status and the thing will just suddenly turn off. No warning. No explanation. Grrr!

Review: Review by a Runner
by: Dale on date: March 28, 2007
I've been running with this for about a month now in Kuwait. It's my new running buddy! It has many options for running/training. The only thing it can't do is hook up to your computer. However, it can store 2yrs worth of training. If you're a techy, then perhaps the 201 or 301 might be for you. But the 101 does pretty much everything they can do. Just for the record, it does not have a heart monitor, but who cares? Just RUN!

Review: Great Training Helper
by: Kristin F. Chadwick on date: March 22, 2007
I love this watch! It has motivated me so much. You know that feeling when you feel like you just want to stop, well, with the Garmin, all the sudden you look down and you have about .25 miles to go until your goal...it is a constant encourager for me! Love it.

Review: Good training partner
by: Sarah Politz on date: June 7, 2007
This is a great gadget that helped me train for a half marathon. When using this watch I dont feel as though I am training by myself. When I see my pace has slowed down I know it is time to kick it up a notch. I also used the watch during my race. So helpful! Again, I was able to keep track of my pace and time to be sure that I was using my energy to its fullest potential. The only downfall is that regular AAA batteries do not last long. I only got about 4 hours out of brand new batteries. Keep an eye on battery life and it is a fun, helpful gps watch.

Review: excellent
by: Janet I. Stevens on date: June 8, 2007
product arrived in timely fashion and was as described. would do business again. my husband found the device easy to read while running which was of utmost importance because he does require reading glasses for most things of this nature. it was also very accurate! great training device for runners.

Review: awesome, it really keeps me going. and it's easy!
by: Jennifer L. Scanland on date: June 1, 2007
This little device is awesome, it keeps me moving, I adore the virtual partner as I walk alone most of the time and am training for the NIKE marathon. I love it.

Review: Very pleased - so far
by: M. J. Harris on date: May 14, 2007
I haven't figured out how to use everything on the menu, but for measuring pace, time and distance, it is meeting my needs!

Review: Running buddy
by: J. Ewell on date: May 12, 2007
This navigator has been an awesome tool to inspire me to run more throught the week. It helps my jogs to be less boring & brings out a competitive side I was lacking. I found out about the Forerunner through my brother who trains for the LA Marathon each year, he recommended it to me. It has REALLY made a difference. I'm currently just training for 5K's but my new running buddy will get me to the 10K eventually!

Review: Not perfect, but still a great little training tool
by: Librarian from NC on date: June 13, 2007
I have really been enjoying the Forerunner 101 since purchasing it a few weeks ago. I love the freedom of varying my running routes without worrying about not having an exact measurement of the distance I've run. Here are a few comments about the product:



- After double-checking my routes in the car and comparing them to my Forerunner's calculations, it seems to be pretty accurate with distance measurements. It is possible that it is sometimes off by .10 mile or so, but that is usually close enough to satisfy me.



-It can sometimes take as long as 5 minutes to initially locate the signal. This is a minor inconvenience but one I can live with.



-It doesn't seem to be capable of picking up a strong signal with a lot of tree overhang. This is disappointing because I would like to use it for trail running and hiking.



-The AAA batteries work well as a power source. I purchased the rechargeable type of AAA batteries for convenience. One should probably keep an eye on the battery life indicator on the Forerunner and go ahead and put in a fresh pair of batteries when the battery indicator gets down to one line.

Review: Not perfect, but still a great little training tool
by: Librarian from NC on date: June 13, 2007
I have really been enjoying the Forerunner 101 since purchasing it a few weeks ago. I love the freedom of varying my running routes without worrying about not having an exact measurement of the distance I've run. Here are a few comments about the product:



- After double-checking my routes in the car and comparing them to my Forerunner's calculations, it seems to be pretty accurate with distance measurements. It is possible that it is sometimes off by .10 mile or so, but that is usually close enough to satisfy me.



-It can sometimes take as long as 5 minutes to initially locate the signal. This is a minor inconvenience but one I can live with.



-It doesn't seem to be capable of picking up a strong signal with a lot of tree overhang. This is disappointing because I would like to use it for trail running and hiking.



-The AAA batteries work well as a power source. I purchased the rechargeable type of AAA batteries for convenience. One should probably keep an eye on the battery life indicator on the Forerunner and go ahead and put in a fresh pair of batteries when the battery indicator gets down to one line.

Review: excellent
by: Janet I. Stevens on date: June 8, 2007
product arrived in timely fashion and was as described. would do business again. my husband found the device easy to read while running which was of utmost importance because he does require reading glasses for most things of this nature. it was also very accurate! great training device for runners.

Review: Good training partner
by: Sarah Politz on date: June 7, 2007
This is a great gadget that helped me train for a half marathon. When using this watch I dont feel as though I am training by myself. When I see my pace has slowed down I know it is time to kick it up a notch. I also used the watch during my race. So helpful! Again, I was able to keep track of my pace and time to be sure that I was using my energy to its fullest potential. The only downfall is that regular AAA batteries do not last long. I only got about 4 hours out of brand new batteries. Keep an eye on battery life and it is a fun, helpful gps watch.

Review: awesome, it really keeps me going. and it's easy!
by: Jennifer L. Scanland on date: June 1, 2007
This little device is awesome, it keeps me moving, I adore the virtual partner as I walk alone most of the time and am training for the NIKE marathon. I love it.

Review: Very pleased - so far
by: M. J. Harris on date: May 14, 2007
I haven't figured out how to use everything on the menu, but for measuring pace, time and distance, it is meeting my needs!

Review: Running buddy
by: J. Ewell on date: May 12, 2007
This navigator has been an awesome tool to inspire me to run more throught the week. It helps my jogs to be less boring & brings out a competitive side I was lacking. I found out about the Forerunner through my brother who trains for the LA Marathon each year, he recommended it to me. It has REALLY made a difference. I'm currently just training for 5K's but my new running buddy will get me to the 10K eventually!

Review: Good but missing something
by: Shelly 824 on date: May 9, 2007
This is a good product if you want the basics only. It takes awhile for the satellite tracking to find you but once it does you are all set...unless you are around a city with lots of tall buildings. If you want to track distance and time only this is the perfect product for you. If you want heart rate, training monitoring and step count, keep looking this isn't even close. I use it a lot when I am walking and it is very compact so it fits in my purse so I can take it to work. I walk at lunch so to monitor my distance and time only this is perfect. I don't use it when I really workout after work. It runs on AAA batteries so that makes it easy to replace them even though they last a long time.

Review: No signal and unexpected power loss
by: N. Prause on date: May 7, 2007
I was so excited to get this, but I've now tried it multiple times in different cities, and it drops the sinal constantly. Unfortunately, it just not reliable for distance or speed. For those of us with real training needs (I don't want to know when I've gone "about" a mile, I need to know if my mile was in 7:40 or 7:42) this does not work.

Also, multiple brand new batteries and the unit indicating full battery status and the thing will just suddenly turn off. No warning. No explanation. Grrr!

Review: Review by a Runner
by: Dale on date: March 28, 2007
I've been running with this for about a month now in Kuwait. It's my new running buddy! It has many options for running/training. The only thing it can't do is hook up to your computer. However, it can store 2yrs worth of training. If you're a techy, then perhaps the 201 or 301 might be for you. But the 101 does pretty much everything they can do. Just for the record, it does not have a heart monitor, but who cares? Just RUN!

Review: Great Training Helper
by: Kristin F. Chadwick on date: March 22, 2007
I love this watch! It has motivated me so much. You know that feeling when you feel like you just want to stop, well, with the Garmin, all the sudden you look down and you have about .25 miles to go until your goal...it is a constant encourager for me! Love it.

Review: Battery eater, but pretty neat
by: Suzanne D. Ramsey on date: March 21, 2007
Eats batteries, so I would suggest getting a AAA charger. 15 hours isn't very long if you do long runs or walks. Other than that, and it's enormous size, which is a little big for a woman's arm in my opinion, it's really neat. It seems to work well, and I like knowing exactly how far I've gone. Haven't tried it on trails with lots of tree cover yet, but works well in the winter.

Review: Best Buy For The Buck!
by: W. R. Happe on date: March 15, 2007
The Forerunner 101 is extremely accurate and fun to use. Verified it several times. Advantages are low cost, buy your own rechargeable batteries and don't have to worry about lithiums or replacements. Purchase an inexpensive heart monitor if you want and save all the added expense of getting the combination unit. If the heart rate monitor/belt goes bad you can replace it cheaper. Overall cost is lower, basics are there, batteries easily replaced, keeps good records. A little more effort but not inconvenient. Prefer it to the more expensive models.

Review: Great product!
by: K. Mathe on date: March 11, 2007
This product is amazing! It is so easy to use and so useful especially when running long distances and you don't know how far you've been. I would recommend this product to anyone!

Review: garmin user
by: T. L. McDonald on date: March 8, 2007
Wonderfull training device, i have not started using the virtual trainer but can't wait to start.

Review: The Forerunner 101 is fantastic!
by: Michelle Hart on date: February 20, 2007
The Forerunner 101 is easy to use. It may not have as many bells and whistles as some of the other models, but it does have all of the functions I need. I thought having to change batteries would be a pain, but it hasn't been an issue. Definitely worth the money.

Review: Great Value
by: MLB on date: January 26, 2007
The Garmin Forerunner 101 may be the entry level for Garmin but it packs all the necessary information to enhance any level of runners workout. I was suprised by all the features offered in the 101, for example: a two year work out history; Workout maps; pace; time; distance; personal assistant actually too many to mention.
Garmin started into the market with a homerun on the Forerunner 101 and continues to enhance their line of Forerunners.
My running partner purchased the Garmin Forerunner 305 with the heart rate monitor capabilities. Although the 305 is robust and packed with features; I would still purchase the 101 for it's simplistic menu that offers everthing any level of runner needs to train.


Review: Christmas gift for daughter
by: Randall White on date: January 20, 2007
Gave the GPS to my dauhter, she has started running. She said it is very accurate, easy to operate, and can see it at a glance, she said it helps her keep her pace, give her incentive to run.

Review: Garmin pedometer
by: R. Chambers on date: January 16, 2007
I love it! A little large on the wrist but OK. Doesn't lose satelites easily as some GPS do. Works well even when covered by a coat sleve.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101 The Best
by: D. Mauger on date: January 10, 2007
The Garmin Forerunner 101 wrist-mounted GPS is the best entry level personal training device available. If you like simple functioning and don't need or intend to download records of your runs, then this model is for you. I have heard complaints from some that you go through lots of batteris, but to overcome this simply buy a handful of rechargeable batteries (e.g. Nickel-metal hydride NiMH). The recharageables will provide adequate power for several runs totaling about 4-5 hours, and for longer events simply carry a spare set of fully charged batteries and swap them out and keep on running! Forerunner 101 the best in terms of its simplicity to use and modest cost. If your buying a GPS training device for the first time, then go with the 101.

Review: Great for runners and walkers
by: Dave on date: January 10, 2007
We bought one for my brother, who is an avid runner, and another for my father-in-law, who walks regularly. Both loved it. They say the accuracy is amazing and they enjoy altering their routes while at the same time being able to calculate their distances. I would highly recommend the product. Although this model doesn't have all the bells and whistles of the more expensive ones, it appears to have the same core components for tracking distance and speed.

Review: A great little gadget
by: Mr. A on date: January 9, 2007
I bought this for my girlfriend as a gift. She is very petite and I was afraid it would be too big for her. Not only does the wrist strap adjust to fit snuggly, it also is light enough where she barely realizes she has it on. The display is big enough to see at a quick glance. It "warms up" quickly and is ready to use in a matter of seconds. A great "toy" at a really good price.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101--Awesome
by: Cora Robbins on date: January 3, 2007
One of the best running watches I've ever purchased! Very accurate and aids in any workout that I have!

Review: Unknown Chemicals
by: Helen on date: November 21, 2006
Was a little upset that no where online did it mention that this product has chemicals in it that are known to cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive harm. I returned it immediately and did not even try it out. If I had tried it out - I'm sure I would have loved it, but I can find a GPS system that's not going to mess up my future.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101: Love It or Hate It.
by: T. A. Seidl on date: November 11, 2006
I'm loving it. Once you understand and accept the limitations of GPS you will be able to live with it's shortcomings. So far, I haven't had trouble with my unit with regards to functionality or signal reception in flat open NE Ohio. For an entry level device, considering it's light weight and small size, it is a little marvel. Ten years ago, much larger hand held units where massively more inaccurate than people accuse the Forerunner of having today. One nice feature about GPS units is that once the device has physically visited a particular location, it will be more precise when it visits that location again. The data the Forerunner produces is very helpful in maintaining pace and tracking distances, but the virtual partner is hidden gem of encouragement. Accurate or not, the Forerunner has gotten me out on the road again when I normally wouldn't bother.

Review: Great product, but only last for a few weeks.
by: J. CHANG on date: August 24, 2006
I bought my first Forerunner 201 2 months ago. It had so many wonderful functions, I purchased 3 more immediately for our running team. After 2 weeks, one went dead. Then, one by one, three went dead. Amazon is excellent in replacing new ones. But even the replacement broke down after a few weeks. I really like the product, but now I am looking for other options - Timex Distance+time, or Nevman.

Review: My husband loves it!
by: M. Jacques on date: August 21, 2006
I bought this for my husband who ran his 1st marathon last fall. He can keep on pace, see his accurate distance, tell how many calories he's burned, etc. I personally don't have much experience with it, but my husband says He loves it!

Review: Very tempermental and often innacurate.
by: GrizzlyMike on date: May 24, 2006
I recently purchased this unit to replace the wireless computer on my bicycle. Out in the open the unit often works fine. Any time you venture onto any trails or urban areas with tall buildings the unit fails miserably and you get the GPS tracking error.

Also, I noticed any time you cycle within close proximity to trees you lose a signal as well. It doesnt seem to matter how high the trres are or if the tree coverage is to the left,right, or both - once you come withint 500 feet of a treeline the unit just loses signal and refuses to track even when the remainder of the view remains clear.

I have found unless you run, hike, or bike in an area that offers complete 360 degree unobstructed views the unit is pretty much worthless.

Another thing I noticed is that more than once when I did have signal acquisition the readouts would be innacurate. For instance I would often get a readout that has my speed at say 78mph and have me traveling 220 miles when in fact I simply rode perhaps half a mile at a lesiruley pace. Overall this has given me reason to suspect the accuracy of the unit even when signal acquisition is not an issue.

I suspect this is one of those 'you get what you pay for' scenarios that you learn from. Cheapest is not always best. Unfortunatley you cannot try before you buy.

Back to the regular cycle computer.

Review: good buy
by: Erik D. Segura on date: March 19, 2006
great for keeping your training log. uses up batteries fast, yet very user friendly

Review: Excellent for runners
by: Aaron P. Vowels on date: March 14, 2006
I've been using the Forerunner 101 since my wife got it for me for Valentine's Day. It's an outstanding piece of equipment. I use it for all my runs and the Virtual Partner helps out since I haven't found anyone crazy enough to run with me. I ran the Anthem 5K last weekend and it was not only accurate, but apparently water-resistant because of the pouring rain. It does seem to lose signal if you're amongst the skyscrapers in the city, but once you run out of the "concrete canyons" it pops you right back to where you need to be. I'm thrilled with it and I hope to be using it for years to come.

Review: Garmin review
by: T. Largo on date: March 8, 2006
It's nice to finally know how far each run is! Sometimes it's a bit of a bother to have to put the device out in the open prior to a run to allow it to "find" its bearings, but this usually takes about 2 minutes. Also, I have tended to go through the AAA batteries pretty quickly, so need to keep the device off when not in use.

Review: I'm taking mine back to the store today
by: Nobody special on date: January 29, 2006
This is probably a good product for walkers or hikers, or for non-urban runners. However, I wore it on a run around a 5/8 mile track that passes about 20 feet from a parking garage and a hospital. On the first lap, the Forerunner measured .51 miles. On the second, it registered 18.6 miles! And so it went. My 5/8 mile lap shows up as anywhere from .3 to 20 miles. I e-mailed Garmin tech support and got a prompt response telling me that it's called multipath error and directing me to another company's website for an explanation. I get the impression that Garmin isn't particularly proud of this product.

I also find that it's very slow to capture the signal. I don't want to stand around for 5 minutes waiting for the sattelite signal before I can get moving.

My last comment is about the size and weight. I'm a small woman, and I find it pretty uncomfortable because the width of the unit is just a little greater than the space between the bones of my wrist. Even though the band fits loosely, the weight and pressure compromise circulation to my hand.

I do believe it would be good for hikers in open country who just need a rough estimate of how far they've gone (I haven't tried the mapping feature, since I run in a circle and it's pretty hard to get lost that way.) For training purposes, though, it doesn't give me accurate enough information to be of any use.

Review: Really good GPS
by: C. Maeda on date: December 15, 2005
I really like this GPS. I use it mainly for hiking and backpacking and it has taken a lot of abuse. It isn't totally waterproof... just water resistant. I have worn it in the rain and it was fine although water did get into the battery compartment during a particularly bad downpour. Its' very light... One of the lightest GPSes on the market. Its' not overly complex and its' good for backtracking and going off trail. I like that the screen is recessed into the unit because I've bumped it many times into rocks and stuff but because the screen is recessed into the unit, there's only very light scratches on it. My other GPS doesn't have this feature. I really like how the screens are setup as well. You can make custom screens to track your mileage, time and other stuff.
That said, I do have a couple complaints. The first complaint is that the battery lasts about 8 or 9 hours. That means I always have to carry extra batteries during backpacking trips that are longer than 2 days. (I keep the GPS on for 4 or 5 hours per day on average.)
The battery compartment is also a pain. Its' hard to get the batteries out without using a screwdriver. I use rechargeable batteries and damaged the top of one. So I now put a short strip of ribbon in the battery compartment to make it easier to take the battery out.
The reception is not as good as my other GPS... A Magellan eXplorist 300. But it is good enough most of the time for me to get around. The only time, I have lost the GPS signal for a long period of time was in the Grand Canyon, where I frequently lost the signals for miles at a time. But that's probably because of the canyon walls. But for most trips, the reception is fine. Reception is poor inside my home unless I'm near the window. I noticed that the eXplorist always has good reception just about anywhere.
This is the GPS I use most of the time. Its' light, simple, cheap and it keeps me on trail.

Review: Great little gadget
by: Dan - Seattle on date: December 12, 2005
extremely accurate and convenient to use. The AAA batteries last surprisingly long; I have had it for about a month and have yet to replace the batteries. It connects to GPS quite fast and holds on well. Of course you can't run in the woods because the trees block the signals. I like running with it because it's fun to keep track of my progress.

Review: Mine Broke in 80 Days.
by: William Durham on date: December 10, 2005
I bought the Garmin to train for a marathon. It was great at first-- being able to run without coming up with routes and getting extremely accurate pace information, etc.

BUT: After about 30 days, it started messing up occassionally. Example: I would run for 11 minutes, look down and it would say I'd run 2 miles (I usually run 9 minute miles). Or, I'd look down and realize it hadn't been recording me run for 5 or 6 minutes.

After that, I always had doubts about accuracy.

Then, it started struggling to find a signal. Every time I wanted to use it, I would have to relocate the signal (which takes 10 minutes, as opposed to the normal 1-2 minutes).

Then, it wouldn't turn off. I had to remove the batteries after use and put them back in whenever I would use it. Then after about 80 days (of heavy use, running 30-40 miles/week), it stopped working altogether.

Didn't even make it through 1 marathon training. Maybe mine was a fluke. I didn't call customers service. Maybe they'd have replaced it. Nonetheless, it was quite annoying.

Review: Excellent Trainer for the budget-minded!!!
by: T. Mettler on date: December 7, 2005
I purchased this several months ago and it is very cool. First of all, being kind of a gadget guy, it motivates me to go running since I can use the gadget. the personal trainer is a nice function, too. It keeps me honest and sometimes I like to "race" the trainer. The GPS locks in pretty quick, but sometimes can lose signal in trees.

If you want to spend a little more to be able to download data to your computer, look to the 201, but for the money, this is a great buy.

Review: 3 Replacements- So Far!!
by: Z. Gonzalez on date: November 11, 2005
I bought my battery operated Forerunner in 2004. Since then, I have had the unit replaced a total of 3 times to date because each unit inexplicably stops working after weeks or months of use (I use it for running workouts only). I have not received a reason or response from the company as to why this happens. All the feedback you get is to return the malfunctioning unit for "repairs." Inevitably, they send you a brand new one. Of course the company does not cover your own cost to ship the unit each time. It's great technology that works well-when it works. Because of my experience with the unit I would not recommend it to anyone, nor will I purchase another from this company.

Review: great training device
by: Michael E. Mchugh on date: September 30, 2005
5 stars-- it does everything i want it to do. running, geocaching, and even a little navigation while paddling my kayak! of the three run is what it is designed for, but all in all a very versatile machine!

Review: 101 Wrist-Mounted GPS Personal Training Device
by: Michelle Mitchell on date: September 29, 2005
The quality of the product is exceptional and reasonably priced. HOwever, it is very difficult to program using the instructions that are provided.

Review: Garmin Forerunner 101
by: E. Thompson on date: September 16, 2005
A great piece of technology. I am marathon training and it has been very helpful. I have used it in Houston and in Honolulu and it worked very well both places. I did have a complete failure with the original about 10 days in but Amazon replaced it immediately even before the old one was returned. I do suggest upgrading to the next model which I understand is rechargeable, as I have to change bateries. Or just change batteries. I recommend this produt strongly.

Review: Too big!
by: ADG in Dallas on date: September 5, 2005
It works fine, but it's way, way, way too large! Who wants to run around with a gadget the size of a cell phone strapped on your wrist. I jog IN PUBLIC man! I just cut the band off and now I run with it in my cell phone case.

If you buy it, be sure to get a cell phone case to go with it. Type this number in the amazon.com search box to get the same case I have (it's a perfect fit): B00024S92U. That product number should pull it right up.

Review: Great item, I enjoy the freedom
by: David F. Guy on date: July 28, 2005
This is my second Garmin Product. I actually started out with the 201. Twice It died on me. First time, after 3 months, so it was in warranty. Second time, a year later. I wanted another GPS device, and figured the 101 would be simpler, so less to break-down. (yeah yeah, no reason to buy something!). So far it's been working fine. I don't miss the download capability, and the slight size increase due to the AAA batteries hasn't been a problem.
Despite their occasionaly odd problems, (seizing up, etc.) Garmin puts out a pretty good product. I do agree with what others have said,,MAKE THE WRIST BAND EASY TO REMOVE FOR CLEANING!! It gets a little funky after a few sweaty runs.

Review: newbie for GPS and Marathon
by: A. Longano on date: July 18, 2005
Taken on the daunting task of preparing for the NYC marathon. Noticed this item when looking for a pedometer that would accurately measure distance. Since I have been only using the device for two weeks I would list the following:
· Pros:
1. Easy to use- press a button (after 2 - 5minutes of initial location of GPS signal) and u are off and running. In both areas that I use my device in northern NJ it founds a signal within 5 minutes while I am stretching. When it loses a signal it recalibrates when it finds it again so I don't lose much in mileage listing.
2. Variety - no more measuring off routes in my car for those long distance runs. Now I can just take off and explore- Great to be able to just be able to glance down and see distance, time, and my average speed.
3. Water resistance- basic water resistance (it says) so sweat and some rain shouldn't break your near $100.00-training piece.
4. Training log- who needs to download info, u can quick views your progress and delete unneeded ones or errors.
5. Batteries- personal preference, I like the AAA options- u don't have to worry about charging times or can just go with rechargeable batteries and always have 2 ready in case of emergency.
6. Value- for this low price it is worth a shot but save your box and receipt in case signal fails in your area.
· Cons:
1. Signal- if you do trail running or some inner city running the signal could be a concern. Noticed that heavy tree canopy or large buildings may block signal. It does pick up the signal and recalibrate but that may not be an option if u run on a tree covered park/trail all the time. Maybe the Fortex would be better for Trails?
2. Rudimentary Map- the "breadcrumb" dotted map navigation is more of a gimmick. Not sure if I could find my way back by using the very basic map information. But this is really a GPS for keeping track of running and biking information not trying to find yourself around. If you need a real navigation system you would need a more advance and more expensive item.
3. Delivery- Amazon took over 2 weeks and still had not shipped. Went with a Merchant and it shipped the next day.

Overall - worth the money for your training- it helps keep runs fresh and the ability to check how your stats are is amazing. The use of the Forerunner gets very addicting and it is now as valuable as my MP3 player on my runs. Hope it keeps working till November and beyond! Good luck and healthy running.


Review: Nice unit for the price.
by: Tom on date: July 12, 2005
I've used this GPS for about a week now, so I don't have in-depth knowledge of all the functions, but I can give some feedback.

I didn't like the clunky feel of something that size on my wrist and I didn't like it on my arm (just personal preference). So I use a small cell phone case clipped to my belt. I really like the fact that it is water proof, because the first day I used it, the rain was heavy. The auto alarm feature to chime every X miles is great (I set it to chime every .5 miles), as is the auto-lap feature which I set to log my 1 mile splits. Recalling the runs works well since it shows splits and cumulative time in one screen, and it shows daily, weekly and a total miles (although I don't yet know what "total" here means - since I put new batteries in?) The main navigation screen (with a dotted-line map) is very cryptic and I can't imagine using it to find your way back to a starting point like they advertise.

Since my requirements were simply (initially) tell me how far I've run, and at what pace, and a price around $100, this unit did great. Now, of course, my wish list has changed since I've been using it. Here are a few features I think it should have that would be trivial for the manufacturer to add:

* Get rid of the wrist-watch style band (pins) and put the band through slots in the back of the unit so the band would be easier to remove to wash, or
* For those of use who sweat when we run, make the band out of soft rubber, so it won't get stinky since it is made out of fabric.
* Auto power off if it is not being used (i.e. user has not pressed a button in 10 minutes and the unit hasn't moved), since the batteries only last one day if left on.
* Add a small hole on one end so I can attach a short lanyard to pull it out of a cell phone case.


Review: Tried and true
by: N. Andrix on date: June 20, 2005
I bought this is desperation after my bike magnetic sensor had frustrated me beyond words. The bike mount is great and the 101 worked flawlessly on a 130 ride through all sorts of back roads and terrain. Next I took it to Acadia National park on some bike and hike routes - in lousy weather most of the time. Again, absolutely no problems and readings are sooo accurate - including altitude! Get the battery model and keep a spare set.

Review: great gear but not waterproof enough
by: M. McGraw on date: June 17, 2005
I love the 101 - I'm addicted to the feedback, exactness, etc. I won't run or bike without it. It even works as a poor man's GPS for very basic navigational use.

Only real deficiency is that for someone who sweats profusely (which means, "anyone who works out in South Florida 8 months of the year") the unit is not waterproof. This fact is ironic since I first saw it advertised in a magazine on the arm of an extreme kayaker splashing through big surf. I returned it to Garmin once and they replaced it. I still have to break open the battery box after every sweaty run and swab out the battery area and connections with a q-tip to attempt to fight corrosion. Waterproofing is the only achilles heel of an otherwise phenomenal piece of gear.

Not sure if the 201 has the same problem given the fact that it doesn't have batteries.


Review: Awesome for marathon training!
by: A. Hall on date: June 9, 2005
I've had the Garmin Forerunner 101 for about 6 months. I bought it to help me train for my first marathon. Without this tool it would have been difficult to maintain variety in my training, which I considered a key element in staying motivated. I also recommend this for those who travel. You no longer have to find pre-determined distances--you can just run wherever you feel like. I have used it in a few different countries and love its versatility. I also feel the 101 is a better value than the 201, it's about 50-100 bucks less because it uses AAA batteries, that's the only difference. However, the 201 is slimmer in design. I highly recommend this product--well worth the money!!

Review: Old Runner Tries Something High Tech
by: C. Carter on date: March 26, 2005
I investigated all of the reviews on this unit and purchased it with minimal expectations at amazon.com.
This unit exceeds my expectations for service. It does everything that it should do and was promised to do. It gives me the freedom to run routes without having to pre measure and the accuracy is astounding. I am a 60 year old runner that runs one half marathon race per month. I am so impressed with this unit. The main criticism I had heard about was that it would lose signals. Not the case. I run rural areas with trees and have encountered no loss of signal at all. The ease of operation is astounding. The navigation system has not been totally mastered but will be with time.
If you are a runner, buy this unit. The batteries hold up well and unless you want to download into a computer, save your money and buy this unit.
Thanks

Alabama Old Runner

Review: Very happy with this purchase
by: Jen on date: February 11, 2005
I love the Forerunner, it really pushes me to work harder on my walks and runs when I have a measurable record of my time, pace, and distance. I find that the pace function is not terribly accurate and seems to lag behind my actual pace, but I believe the average pace listed at the end of the run is fairly accurate, and that is all that I am concerned with. The first day I ran with it, I wore it on my wrist, but it was not all that comfortable, so the next day I added the extender strap to it and wore it on my forearm, just below my elbow, and I liked it a lot better that way; I don't even notice it there. I could even see the screen better by just looking down at it and not having to lift my wrist up. I think the pace function was slightly more accurate when worn up higher on the arm because the unit wasn't swinging around as much. I wear a black terrycloth wristband (cheapo type) under the Forerunner's strap so that the strap doesn't get all sweaty, and it makes the unit more comfortable to wear as well. I like the fact that the batteries can be changed; I want to use this thing for much longer than the expected life of rechargeable type batteries.

Review: Weak GPS reception makes this useless
by: Colossal on date: February 2, 2005
The first two times I used this device it worked relatively fine -- GPS signal dropped a couple of times, but I expected this to happen every once in a while. Ever since then, I get signal, at best, about 25% of the time. Cloudy, not cloudy. Tall buildings or a clearing -- the signal is always weak (and the batteries are good). I'm giving this device two stars because the concept is fantastic. Too bad the device is useless without signal. The stopwatch works well, but I can get one of those for $10 at Target. Perhaps my unit is defective. Either way, I'm returning it.

Review: It actually DOES work!
by: A. D. Straw on date: December 8, 2004
I purchased this product with the expectations that it would most certainly NOT work. I was sure that it would not be able to locate, or hold, the satellite signal or would not be truly accurate. I'm happy to report that I was wrong about both. I turn on my unit, set it outside, put on my walking shoes, and by the time I leash up the dogs, my Garmin has found the satellite and I'm off and walking. I should also say that it appears to be very accurate. To check it, I walked 2 miles one way, and then took the same route back to see if it would give me the same mileage. Going out, I walked 2.00 miles, and coming back, it said I walked 2.05 miles. That is plenty accurate enough for me. I've used this product everyday and it has yet to lose the satelite signal once securing it.
The only negative thing I can come up with is that the battery life does not last the 14 hours, or so, that is advertised. It's more like 8 to 10 hours, at the most, before I have to change batteries.

I would highly recommend this product. Hope this review helps you!

Review: Not accurate
by: Miles E. Branch on date: November 15, 2004
The pace calculation is very inaccurate. I have been running for 15 years and know when I am maintaining a constant pace. According the Forerunner 101 my pace varies from 7:30-minute miles to 9:00-minute miles all within the same mile. This renders the virtual training partner feature useless. This is not much more than a very expensive sports watch. When I sent an e-mail to Garmin tech support about the problem. It took them almost four working days to answer and then only to tell me that that's as good as it gets.

Review: a disappointment
by: Rita Felski on date: November 14, 2004
I was thrilled to get this gadget at first, as I find difficult to gauge how fast I'm running. However, I've had it for about four or five months now, and increasingly, I'm finding that the GPS function is not working (and no, it's not a battery problem). 80% of the time, when I'm out running, the watch face reads "weak GPS signals," at which point, it stops working. This happens both when I'm running in town and in the country. I don't know if this has anything to do with where I live (Charlottesville, VA), but I'm becoming increasingly frustrated with this gadget!

Review: Revolutionized my running
by: William Jankowski on date: October 8, 2004
1. Super easy to use. Turn it on, wait until it syncs up with the satellites, push start, and it's off. Push stop when you want to stop. Reset the counters. The run is now in internal memory.

2. The unit's got a pretty sensitive reciever. Our neighborhood is pretty wooded, but it'll gain sync in our driveway, under a giant maple tree and smaller japanese maple. It holds it pretty well on the roads. I haven't tried a trail run - yet.

3. I don't think it's too obtrusive. My lovely wife thought it was a little too big to strap to her wrist. It does come with a band extender; Melissa is thinking about trying it again strapped to her upper arm. The disadvantage would be not being able to see the display, but if you're just interested in recording, it's not an issue. That, and most of the functions (mile marker, etc) have audible cueing. I can't hear the beeps over my iPod, though.

4. Nice features - Clear display, good backlight. The backlight automatically comes on when the unit has an alert (passing another mile, falling off pace, etc). The Training Partner is kind of nice. If Garmin keeps it when the Forerunner is updated, they could speed it up on downhills and slow it down on uphills (GPS gives elevation data).

Gripes:
1. The unit design is not poor by any stretch of the imagination. But, after the iBook and the iPod (not to mention small details like the international power adapters Apple has available that work with both items' power supplies), my standards are high. My gripe is that the UI is 6 buttons, all pretty similar size and texture, on the side of the unit. One of the reasons I'm skeptical of today's third mile split is because I accidentally turned the unit off between the 1st and 2nd miles. I stopped and turned it back on again, but it threw off the "odometer". Yes, I was an idiot for pushing and holding the power button (for like 3 seconds; it's not really easy to do by mistake), but the backlight is turned on by briefly pressing the power button.

2. It's missing the geeky GPS features, like a lat/long display, or the ability to select between different GPS data (WGS 84/UTM/etc - you either know what I'm talking about already, or you don't care). There are some work-arounds I've found (such as marking a waypoint at the current location to get lat/long), but I don't think I'm getting rid of my Magellan GPS 315 any time soon. I think this may be intentional on Garmin's part - why give away a big part of their market on a sub - $100 device. I think it'll work backpacking, especially if I take the time to pre-set waypoints. But I'm still mainly a map-and-compass kind of guy in any case. And the 101's "Back to start" feature ought to bail me out.

3. There's no ability to turn GPS on/off unless the machine can't acquire a satellite. There's also no ability to tell the unit where it is, so initial acquisition of a signal can last up to 30 minutes the first time you turn the unit on, or if you travel more than 500 miles with the unit off. In practicality, mine acquired signal in about 5 minutes right out of the box.

Review: Unbeatable for Walking - A Fantastic Piece of Technology
by: E. Osworth on date: September 23, 2004
This thing is an excellent product at a very reasonable price.

It is lightweight and has an ingenious strap system so you can wear it on your wrist or even over a jacket (It get's cold here in Oregon). The batteries last a Long Time, just be sure to turn it off when you are done using it. There is no auto-off after a certain amount of time, like my other GPS unit.

You get the data you need and more.

Pace, altitude, distance, time, lap, and it creates a map of your walk at the same time, so you can use it to back track. The reception is good here and I live (and walk) in a Pacific Northwest forest! When it does lose a signal, it grabs it back quickly.

Be sure to set it outside about 5 minutes before you want to walk or run. It takes a while to get the first fix, which can be frustrating if you are waiting.

You can use it as a basic GPS, so if you hike in a strange place turn it on, start a new run and it will draw you a map and point you the way back to where you started. Pretty Neat.

I have another GPS with much more sophisticated and extensive GPS features, but I find myself using the Forerunner instead most of the time when I am hiking. After getting used to the convenience of the light weight, hands-free Forerunner with it's big easy to read display, the other GPS seems like carrying a brick.







Review: This is a must have for runners!
by: C. Rothe on date: August 7, 2004
I have owned my Forerunner for a year now. I absolutely love the item. First, it is fantastic to know exactly how far I've run, no matter what roads, trails, or bike path I run on. I am no longer confined to my 'measured routes'...I can explore! The Forerunner also gives the current pace. This is probably the second most useful feature it has. While running, I can tell if I have RECENTLY sped up or slowed down. It is much better than the average pace which a sdm will give you. Think about it, if you are on mile 10 and you speed up 30 seconds per mile, your average pace will not be affected immediately.
Some of the other features I find less useful but harmless. The mapping feature on the 101 is silly since the map must be displayed on the 2" screen. Its simply too small. The virtual trainer could be useful, but I never use it.
Other great features are: if set, it will take your mile splits automatically and if set, the back light will come on at each mile (for those early morning runs).
The battery life is great. I am using two normal Duracell batteries and run about 80 miles before changing the batteries.
The signal strength is fine. I have run on tree covered paths and on cloudy days with very few problems. I lost the signal once, but it was very thick tree cover. It continued to track my distance but I don't think it was 100% accurate with the weak signal. Other than that I've never lost my signal.
This product is simply great and I cannot explain how useful it is. Here is how I use it:
I typically start my weekday runs around 5:00am. I leave my front door and walk for a minute or so. I have my signal. I start off on a 6 mile run. I warm up with a pace around 9 min/mi and keep that pace for the first mile. While thinking about my upcoming race my watch beeps and lights up (it is 5:10 am now) and I see that I ran a 9:08 mile. I pick up the pace until I get to an 8 min pace. I realize I ran this same route earlier this week. I decide to turn and run down a new street for some variety. Before I know it my watch beeps, I look down at the lit screen to see that my second mile was 7:58. This goes on for a couple of miles. Around my fourth mile I my mind starts to wander. I look down and notice that I've slowed down during this time. I immediately pick up the pace and decide it is time to find a way home. The way home takes a little longer than I expected, but I get there. I stop my watch to see that I actually ran 6.67 miles and have found another good route. Once inside I can review my data...distance, pace each mile, average pace, fastest pace, the route, and I can compare that to my previous runs! I see I've had another successful run and feel great! I hope my example illustrates the way I use my Forerunner and why I love it.

Review: The Most Useful Fitness Computer You Can Buy
by: on date: June 15, 2004
I've purchased heart rate monitors, altimeters, and computer software as training aids in the past. Their quality was always subpar, and their utility was limited to a small set of variables. Inevitibly, I was still required to use a pen, paper and calculator to figure out much of the training info I needed. In addition, few of these gadgets were helpful in motivating me. I purchased the Forerunner 101 so that I could track my distance and my pace accurately while I ran. Because it is so incredibly accurate, I can run on any of the trails around my house and still know how far I've gone. The unit has been designed extremely well. The numbers YOU want to see are large. The readability of the LCD is excellent. The price makes the product a GREAT value for the money. The quality overall is outstanding. The unit itself is well designed--The Garmin design team needs to be congratulated. Yes, it's a bit heavy, but for the functions it performs, it's well worth it. The Virtual Partner is a waste of time for me. But when I run an official race, I'm sure I'll use it. Like many of the other reviewers, I wish the Forerunner 201 was equiped with AA batteries, as I simply don't trust ION batteries to hold out for much longer than 3 years. This is one of the best fitness products that you can buy!!

Review: Very satisfied
by: John on date: May 26, 2004
First let me say that I am not an avid runner and to be quite honest I have hated the sport of running. (sorry) Because I am in the military we are required to run so I have had to take up the sport. The biggest problem I had though was finding a way to pace myself and train. Everyone has their own suggestion but to follow most regimens you had to know exactly how far and fast you are running.
Now to the forerunner. Since I have purchase this running has become enjoyable. It has always worked very well even in wooded areas and only takes a short time to lock on. It gives you so much information and can do so many things to help one train and pace!! It is very easy to use and to download to the computer. The log book is also excellent and allows one to keep track of distance, time, pace, calories, etc. It has allowed me to run where ever I want and not have to figure out beforehand how long of a run it will be. Only once did it miscalculate my speed (ran a 5 minute mile; I wish).
The only problem I had was when I first got it and had trouble following the instructions for set up. Also one needs to download the new software for the forerunner and log book which fixes freezes.
Again from a non-runner, I would highly recommend it!

Review: love, love, love, love it!!!
by: John A. Radi on date: May 7, 2004
That being said, I only give it 4 stars because I kind of miss the ability to link to my computer (I'm an ultra geek). Still, Lion batteries ONLY have a life of 3 years max - don't let anyone tell you otherwise - and 3 years it won't be NEAR it's original life. EVEN IF it were brand new out of the box, Lion chemistry starts to decay the day after it comes off the manufacturing line - do some research on the internet - that's why the whole slew of ipods are all dying right now.

Enough said - AAA batteries was the primary reason I bought this. Truth is, I rarely keep gadgets long enough to worry about the batteries, but I like passing them on to family and friends and I'd like them to get something that they can use for a couple of years too... Plus, I like putting in a fresh set of batteries every week and not having to worry if it's fully charged... (I use rechargeable AAA's).

All the other reviewers have already covered the basics of the watch. Very easy to use, backlight is amazing at night. History and data compilation are interesting.

What I really wanted to convey is that I was on the fence about this for over a month. Was it worth the money? Would I use it enough? Without a doubt - YES! If it broke today I'd buy a new one tomorrow. The best thing about it is freedom.

I'm pretty anal - most serious runners are. I stick to the exact same path so I can get statistics, make sure I'm sticking to my pace, make sure I ran the distance I intended, compare my run with previous runs. After a while though, it can get a little boring. All of a sudden, I put this on and I'm free from all that. I can run anywhere, I run spontaneously - but a glance down at my wrist and I know how far I've run, I know I'm keeping pace, EVERYTHING. And that little training buddy is pretty cool too - although I usually just like the raw data screen...

I hope in future versions they'll integrate a heart rate monitor. I have one now but can't bring myself to wear two devices at a time...

-jr

Review: Why AAA Batteries (101) Best Internal Batteries (201)
by: Matthew Harris on date: April 7, 2004
I chose to buy the Forerunner 101 rather than the 201 precisely because of its power system. First, rechargeable AAA batteries are relatively cheap, and they last forever. They are also small, and while traveling I'd rather lug around two extra small batteries than a recharging cord. Moreover, in a pinch, you can always find a store that sells standard AAA batteries. Additionally, who wants to wait for the internal batteries to recharge - I'd rather always have a fresh set of rechargeable AAA's on hand.
With this said, it was a tough choice deciding between the 101 and the 201. If only the 101 came with the uploading capabilities of the 201. That, in my mind, would have been the best of both worlds. In the end, I opted for the 101.

Review: The Forerunner 201 for those on a budget
by: Pen Name on date: March 28, 2004
The Garmin Forerunner 101 is exactly the same as the popular Forerunner 201, with a couple of small changes. Being the case, I won't review the actual product since everything that needs to be said about it's GPS features can be found in the reviews for the Forerunner 201.

The most notable difference with the 101 is that it uses 2 AAA batteries istead of being rechargeable like the 201. At first I thought this was a big detraction to buying it, but it's really not that bad. Battery life is decent, although not as high as with the 201, which gets up to 13 hours of use on a full charge. But if you're not a marathon runner and just run a few miles on your runs, this shouldn't matter much. The only hassle is having the batteries go dead during the middle of a run, which really sucks if you're into knowing exactly how far you've gone. You have to keep an eye on the battery life before going out. The batteries don't really effect the weigh or size of the product though.

The second major difference is that this unit does not interface with your PC. This also isn't too big of a problem because, currently, the Garmin software is really lacking. Hopefully they will improve on it with time, but the PC software is nowhere near as nice as it could be at this stage. You can view a graph of your altitude for your run, and graphs of your pace and speed, and that's about it. Otherwise the software is really crummy. You can't even zoom in on your map like you can with the actual unit.

If you're serious about running, I would highly suggest the Forerunner 201 over this product, mainly because the price difference is so negligible. You can find the 201 for only about $20 more than this model, and the extra money is well worth the rechargeability of the 201 and freedom from the batteries. But if you really can't afford the cost, you're not going to be hurting too much with the 101.

Review: My Favorite Gadget - Perfect for Walkers
by: on date: March 28, 2004
I just received this item and used it today for the first time. It's very easy to set up and use and is very accurate. I'm training for a Breast Cancer 3-Day 60-mile walk and this is perfect for my outdoor walking. (It will also work well for running, biking, etc.) I used to only walk places if I checked out the distance in my car first. Now I can walk anywhere I want (on or off-road) and I can keep track of my distance (and speed) without mentally adding up the miles. The Forerunner 101 uses 2 AAA batteries but the Forerunner 201 has an internal rechargeable battery (and you can download information to a PC). I chose this one because I wanted the flexibility to be able to just pop in new batteries whenever I need them instead of waiting for a recharge. Also, on my 3-day walk I won't have access to electricity. This is definitely my favorite gadget of all time. I can't believe it is so affordable.

Review: Great Gift for any Runner
by: Steven L. Mckee on date: March 26, 2004
I live in the "country" and run various routes and always wanted to know how far that I really was running. I also travel alot with the military and I love this tool. I do not need to "guess" how far that I am running in the various cities that I visit. The ability to store large amounts of running history, years worth, is a great feature! The only thing that I regret is that I wish the watch was only $99 when I bought mine :(... but I have enjoyed every mile / minute of this watch. You will not regret buying this watch!

Review: Don't get this model
by: R. Adjemian on date: March 25, 2004
I have the 201 model, and am able to re-charge the batteries. The 101 model requires separate batteries. You should know that this device eats batteries. It's better to have the 201 with the built in rechargeable battery (this gives you 11-12 hours of GPS watch time).





Top Reviews Network
Printer Review - Gps Reviews - Espresso Machine Diva - Buy External Hard Drive - Purchase Webcams